Skip to content
Dara Dillon Start a conversation

STRATEGY · IMPLEMENTATION · PUBLIC SYSTEMS

Strategy is only useful when someone can make it real.

I work in the space between institutional ambition and operating reality, where strategy has to become decisions, structures, capabilities and measurable action.

Strategy & Implementation Advisor · Credentialed Evaluator

Subscribe to [Un]intended Consequences ↗
Dara Dillon, photographed for editorial use.
Dara Dillon, strategy and implementation advisor

01 — THE PREMISE

A plan describes intent. An implementation system changes what happens next.
Marginal note

The implementation gap is rarely a motivation problem.

Institutions are often clear about where they want to go. The difficulty begins when an approved direction meets budgets, governance, competing priorities, inherited systems and limited capacity.

That gap is not solved by another recommendation. It requires the operating logic beneath the strategy: who decides, what changes, how the work is sequenced, what it costs, where the risk sits and how the institution will learn while delivering.

That is the territory I work in.

03 — THE PRACTICE

Three ways the work moves.

ADVISE

Helping leaders understand the decision in front of them—the real options, trade-offs, institutional constraints and consequences.

Strategy · Institutional change · Public systems · Evaluation

BUILD

Translating direction into the models, roles, governance, sequence, measures and tools required to make it operational.

Operating models · Implementation systems · Decision frameworks · Organizational design

THINK

Developing and testing ideas about implementation, institutions, evidence, foresight and the systems behind public decisions.

Essays · Frameworks · Research · Emerging practice

FRAMEWORK — IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE Five stages between an approved direction and a working system. Most institutions can describe stage one and stage five; the work lives in the middle.
01

Direction approved

Intent is settled and the mandate is clear. Nothing about how the institution operates has changed yet.

02

Decision rights set

Who decides, who recommends, who is merely informed — named before the work is scheduled.

03

Operating model built

Roles, sequence, resourcing and the interfaces between teams that have to hand work to each other.

04

Operating readiness

The stage most plans skip and where most stall: can the institution actually carry this on the day it starts?

05

Delivery and learning

Delivery begins, and the evidence it produces returns to sharpen the next decision rather than filing a report.

The decision path — where authority has to be settled Where most implementations stall
See how I work →

05 — OPERATING PHILOSOPHY

Five things I believe.

  1. {{ b.num }}

    {{ b.title }}

    {{ b.body }}

    2.

06 — THE ECOSYSTEM

One body of thinking. Two places it becomes work.

ADVISORY PLATFORM

Common Practice Advisory

Where institutions engage me and the wider team to move from complex decisions to working systems.

“We do the build that everyone else skips.”

Explore Common Practice ↗
PUBLIC-INTEREST PLATFORM

IIBD

DATA ACCOUNTABILITY FOR PUBLIC DECISIONS

Where public-interest questions about data, algorithms, rules and public decisions are examined—and translated into practical tools and learning.

Explore IIBD ↗
Dara Dillon standing outdoors in an urban public setting in Toronto.
Between meetings, Toronto

07 — ABOUT ME

Built across disciplines. Focused on what institutions can actually carry through.

I'm a strategist, Credentialed Evaluator and implementation practitioner with more than 20 years of experience across Canada, the Caribbean and international contexts.

My work spans strategic planning, organizational development, mixed-methods evaluation, public policy, applied research and systems change. Across those disciplines, one question has stayed constant: how do institutions make better decisions—and build the capability to carry them through?

I bring together the long view of strategy, the institutional lens of organizational development and the discipline of evaluation. I'm extending that practice into foresight, policy prototyping, public-private partnerships and implementation science.

MBA, Organisational Development · MSc, Strategic Studies and Security · BA (Hons), Urban Studies · Credentialed Evaluator, Canadian Evaluation Society

Read more about me →

08 — SPEAKING & CONVERSATION

Ideas for rooms where decisions are being made.

I speak with leadership teams, practitioners and public-interest audiences about why strategies stall, how institutions shape outcomes and what it takes to turn evidence into executable choices.

Invite me into the conversation →
  • {{ t.num }} {{ t.title }}

What are you trying to make real?

A strategy that has been approved. A system that no longer fits. A difficult institutional decision. A promising idea that still needs an operating path.

If the challenge sits between intention and execution, start there.

Or write directly: {{ email }}

WORK & PRACTICE AREAS

The work begins where the recommendation ends.

I work with institutions facing questions that cannot be resolved by ambition alone: how a decision will operate, what it requires, where it may fail and how people will know whether it is working.

01 — SELECTED WORK

Problems I've worked on.

Selected engagements across institutional strategy, implementation, evidence and operating design. Open a case to read the mandate, the work and what it produced.

{{ flagship.kicker }}

{{ flagship.title }}

{{ flagship.summary }}

{{ flagship.status }}

MY ROLE

{{ flagship.role }}

{{ p.label }}

{{ p.body }}

{{ c.mandate }}

MY LEADERSHIP

{{ c.leadership }}

DECISION-INTELLIGENCE APPROACH

{{ c.approach }}

DELIVERED

{{ c.delivered }}

STRATEGIC VALUE

{{ c.value }}

02 — PRACTICE AREAS

Six areas the work sits in.

Select an area to see what the work involves and what it produces.

AREA {{ area.num }}

{{ area.title }}

{{ area.lead }}

WHAT IT PRODUCES

  • {{ p }}

{{ area.note }}

03 — FRAMEWORK

The decision-rights map.

Most implementation failures are traceable to an unresolved decision right. Naming who decides, who recommends and who is merely informed is the first structural move in any engagement.

DECISION BOARD EXECUTIVE DELIVERY LEAD PARTNER
Mandate and direction Decides Recommends Consulted Informed
Resource allocation Approves Decides Recommends Informed
Operating design Informed Approves Decides Consulted
Sequencing and trade-offs Informed Consulted Unresolved Consulted
Delivery accountability Informed Approves Decides Recommends
The decision path — a single accountable decider at each level The common failure point — a trade-off nobody owns

04 — ENGAGEMENT PATHWAYS

Ways into the work.

Where the need requires a multidisciplinary team or a full advisory engagement, the route is Common Practice.

Explore Common Practice ↗
  • {{ p }}
    •

05 — HOW A CASE IS DOCUMENTED

The anatomy of a case.

Cases are published only when the institution, method and result can be substantiated, and only where the client has agreed to disclosure. Each follows the same seven-part structure.

  1. {{ c.num }} {{ c.label }}

JOURNAL

Notes on what it takes to make institutions work.

Essays and working ideas about strategy, implementation, public decisions, organizational design, evaluation and the futures institutions say they want to build.

{{ resultCount }}

FEATURED ESSAY

{{ featured.title }}

{{ featured.dek }}

{{ featured.meta }} Read the essay →

[Un]intended Consequences

My newsletter on implementation, institutions and public decisions. It is published on LinkedIn, so subscribing happens there.

Subscribe on LinkedIn ↗
← JOURNAL

{{ article.meta }}

{{ article.title }}

{{ article.dek }}

By Dara Dillon · {{ article.date }}

{{ b.text }}

{{ b.text }}

{{ b.text }}

{{ b.text }}

{{ b.text }}
  • {{ i }}
    •
  1. {{ i.num }} {{ i.text }}
FRAMEWORK — EVIDENCE TO DECISION Evidence only counts when it reaches a decision that has not yet been made.
01 Question Framed with the decision-maker, before the method is chosen.
02 Evidence Pre-specified, so the analysis cannot bend to the answer.
03 Interpretation Separating what the institution controls from what it does not.
04 Decision The only point at which evidence changes anything.

What the decision produces re-enters the next question — the loop, not the report, is the system.
SHARE {{ copied }}

Essays like this reach my newsletter first. [Un]intended Consequences is published on LinkedIn.

Subscribe on LinkedIn ↗
← BACK TO THE JOURNAL

ABOUT

I study the distance between what institutions intend and what their systems deliver.

Dara Dillon speaking during a recorded interview.
In conversation, recorded interview

01 — BIOGRAPHY

MBA, Organisational Development
MSc, Strategic Studies and Security
BA (Hons), Urban Studies
Credentialed Evaluator, Canadian Evaluation Society

Biography

I'm a strategist, Credentialed Evaluator and implementation practitioner with more than 20 years of experience helping organizations understand complex problems, make better decisions and translate direction into action.

My work sits at the intersection of strategy, implementation, public systems and evidence. I'm particularly interested in what happens after a strategy is written: how priorities become operating models, how policy becomes delivery, how institutions make decisions and how those decisions are tested against the outcomes they were designed to produce.

Across Canada, the Caribbean and international contexts, I have worked in strategic planning, organizational development, mixed-methods evaluation, public policy, applied research, programme design and systems change. That experience taught me to read institutions from several directions at once: formal strategy, everyday operations, governance, evidence and the lived consequences of decisions.

At Common Practice Advisory, I contribute to work with governments, institutions, foundations and mission-driven organizations on strategy implementation, operating models, decision intelligence, evaluation and organizational change. The focus is practical: closing the gap between ambition and execution.

My work with IIBD has approached many of these questions from the public-interest side—examining the data, rules, algorithms and systems behind public decisions, and developing practical approaches for making those decisions more explainable, challengeable and fair.

I hold an MBA in Organisational Development, an MSc in Strategic Studies and Security and a BA (Hons) in Urban Studies, and I am a Credentialed Evaluator with the Canadian Evaluation Society. My emerging areas of study and practice include foresight, policy prototyping, public-private partnerships and implementation science.

02 — EDUCATION & CREDENTIALS

Where the practice was built.

{{ c.award }} {{ c.body }}

Working on something that has to become real?

Start a conversation

SPEAKING

A clearer view of the system you are deciding inside.

I bring practice-tested ideas into leadership rooms, conferences, classrooms and public conversations.

Dara Dillon presenting to a seated audience at a leadership session.
On stage, leadership session

01 — FORMATS

Formats

  • {{ f }}
    •

02 — TOPICS

Five talks, built from practice.

{{ t.num }}

{{ t.title }}

{{ t.body }}

03 — INVITATION

Invite me into the conversation.

Tell me the room, the audience and the decision in front of them. Availability, format and scope are agreed case by case.

Send a speaking enquiry

CONTACT

Start with the decision.

Tell me what the institution is trying to decide, change or make operational. A short description of the context, timing and kind of conversation you have in mind is enough to begin.

For a multidisciplinary team or a full advisory engagement, the work is delivered through Common Practice Advisory ↗.

Public-interest questions about data and public decisions belong with IIBD ↗.

MESSAGE SENT

Thank you — your enquiry has reached me.

I read every enquiry myself. You can expect a reply within two business days, usually with a question or two about the decision you are facing before we put time in the calendar.

If it is urgent, write to {{ email }} directly.

Three details are all I need. The rest is optional.

{{ error }}

That did not send — the connection failed rather than your message. Try again, or write to {{ email }} with the same details.

{{ err.name }}

{{ err.email }}

{{ err.brief }}

OPTIONAL CONTEXT

Your details are used only to reply to this enquiry. Nothing is added to a mailing list without your consent. See the privacy page.

PRIVACY

What this site collects, and what happens to it.

{{ p.h }}

{{ p.body }}

Questions or deletion requests: {{ email }}

404 — PAGE NOT FOUND

This page isn't part of the plan.

The address may have changed. The work, the Journal and the way to reach me are all still here.

Return home Go to the Journal